Game Development idea

Birmingham FLY 5 TMaguero LWyoung RWNani CFhernandez

brum 2 fulham 2 41% 4chances to 8 aguero2mom 1sub2sup1good1poorevans

brum 2 fulham 3 47% 5chances to 6 0crosses agueronani 1sub1sup4good

Phil@Arsenal wrote:

Paul Hemmings wrote:

arsenal 3 westham 1 FLY 424 54% 11chances4saves tevez3 2sub2sup3good

arsenal 5 westham 0 57% 13chances tevez3arshRVP 3sub2sup1good

seems to be working okay with improved performances

Just curious paul did the bigger pitch improve the winger proformances?

or is it still, AM-DY-TM with the majority of Sublimes/Superbs?

arsenal 4 westham 0 56% TMsubmom LWsup RWgood DYsub CFsup AMsup LBRBgood

brum 0 fulham 2 44% 3chances to 5 robben2 tmsubmom1sup2good

with SOS on sergio

brum 4 fulham 2 44% 6chances to 7 aguero3hernandez 1subTMmom3sup1goodBegovic

brum 3 fulham 1 aguero3

I think this shows that if you have a worldclass player like Sergio just how effective they can be if used correctly, he might be even more effective if played at ST instead of TMsosbut i shant try that.

Leicester WHV 5 PMcarrick LHkewell RHpark CFPavlyuchenko

Thanks for the feedback, looks like the bigger pitch works better for most teams, and stops cutting out players of phases of plays and brings everyone into the game for more touches. once fully tested i'd be happy to see it introducted into the game

leic 2 chel 1 53% pav2 2chances to 4 1subPM3sup3good

leic 0 chel 0 1chance to 2

not alot of chances in these games

leic 1 chel 2 3chances each pav

ive changed poulsen from AM to DY so he will get up and help the attack out and hopefully create more chances, as a DY he will also help defend when needed but it means no AM

leic 2 chel 0 pav2 2chances to 1

still not man chances, maybe another case of 2 good sides cancelling each other out.

leic 1 chel 0 60% 3chances to 0 PMsub3sup4good1poorkalinic again

leic 3 chel 0 54% pav3 CFsubmom4sup2good1poorkalanic

the increased space is now benefiting wide players who have supporting players who are taking wide defenders who dont have any support.

put poulsen back to AM

leic 1 chel 1 52% 4chances to 1 pav AMsubPMLHsupCFRHCRgood

leic 0 chel 1 53% 3chances to 3 AMsubPMLHCRsupLBCLgood

in these games leicester FBWB are outnumbering chel WG nso chelsea dont create much, and for leic tery is handling pav well so leic arent creating much either with kalinic playing poorly atm

It seems to be working okay

Could u try it with my FLY tactic

Just swap Robben to TM and Milner to LW

I'll do fulham next.

Fulham WIN6 LWrobben RWvalencia CFzamora 50%high crosses

Paul - I hope you have City on in the background.

Paul Hemmings wrote:

ancona 1 roma 1 56% 4cross 4chances 3saves maxwell 1sub2sup1good

ancona 2 roma 2 46% 2cross 3chances 1saves pazzini2 1sub1sup4good

ancona played standard MIX 442 so they do outnumber roma on the wide areas.

ancona 1 roma 0 50% 2cross 1chance

seems to be working as id expect

Would it not be easier on a bigger pitch for the SLO formation to control the ball a lot more, ie more possession?

The results don't really give more percentage of possession than happens currently?

Would you expect that to happen?

leic 0 fulham 3 68% 10chances to 0 milner2robben 2subBWDYmommilnerLWsupCLCFRWgood

leic 0 fulham 2 10chances to 2 milnerrobben

leic 0 fulham 2 7to0 valencia2

leic 1 fulham 3 7to3 zamorarobbenmilner

these results show consistency and highlight the wingers taking advantage of the more space

Tom@Charlton wrote:

Paul Hemmings wrote:

ancona 1 roma 1 56% 4cross 4chances 3saves maxwell 1sub2sup1good

ancona 2 roma 2 46% 2cross 3chances 1saves pazzini2 1sub1sup4good

ancona played standard MIX 442 so they do outnumber roma on the wide areas.

ancona 1 roma 0 50% 2cross 1chance

seems to be working as id expect

Would it not be easier on a bigger pitch for the SLO formation to control the ball a lot more, ie more possession?

The results don't really give more percentage of possession than happens currently?

Would you expect that to happen?

yes normally but our new pitch is only longer not wider and slo is sidetoside not backtofront, so no

Paul Hemmings wrote:

leic 0 fulham 3 68% 10chances to 0 milner2robben 2subBWDYmommilnerLWsupCLCFRWgood

leic 0 fulham 2 10chances to 2 milnerrobben

leic 0 fulham 2 7to0 valencia2

leic 1 fulham 3 7to3 zamorarobbenmilner

these results show consistency and highlight the wingers taking advantage of the more space

Try it against some proper opposition lmao!!

Rob@Inter wrote:

Paul - I hope you have City on in the background.

I do

okay I'll try fulham with milner at LW and robben at TM on FLY

Ok but I dont want rich getting upset with me if it's a cricket score

brum 1 fulham 1 48% 4chancesto6 aguerosubmom(just) and robbensub

brum 2 fulham 2 4chancesto5 fellainiaguero robbenzamorapen

scott parker is now in the right place to deny robben space and hes your main man in FLY, whereas in WIN heis up against Eboue with support from Zaba, interesting how much difference a change like that can make

Paul Hemmings wrote:

leic 0 fulham 3 68% 10chances to 0 milner2robben 2subBWDYmommilnerLWsupCLCFRWgood

leic 0 fulham 2 10chances to 2 milnerrobben

leic 0 fulham 2 7to0 valencia2

leic 1 fulham 3 7to3 zamorarobbenmilner

these results show consistency and highlight the wingers taking advantage of the more space

Paul, was this with the WIN tactic?

BW Dy ?
Was this with an AM aswell, just interesting as with WIN as the unconventional 433 like this creatively wise iv not offered a lot,

Did u drop the AM for an ST?

If not it's very interesting as the way I play the win tactic as you've said shouldn't really work and reding the match reports doesn't really work going forward but seems to keep me pretty solid and allows me the chance to nick a goal

Paul Hemmings wrote:

Fulham WIN6 LWrobben RWvalencia CFzamora 50%high crosses

fulham were tested with..as i said

Interesting,

Paul, in the rule book if I remember rightly win works and can be played without a controlling midfielder, as it effectively aims to get the ball out to the wingers, does it in theory work better though with a controlling midfielder ?

I can't help think I waste my AM by playing a BW aswell, although may explain why ageuero didn't kill me this turn as perhaps tiago and palacios just sandwiched him

Or would palacios had done that on his own giving the way he played

Which position picks up an oppositions TM ? BW or am?